December 7, 2022

21. Physiological And Ecologic...

21. Physiological And Ecological Cleanliness Vs. v@xination
21.1 Von Hoffman: “Do we really need v@xination?”
Physiological drainage is even more important than drainage of swamps, and infinitely more important than germicides and pesticides. The soil (in the body) is prepared for so-called epidemic disease by failure to keep the fluids and tissues of the body sweet and clean.
In the 1850s, when this country suffered with recurring epidemics of cholera, it developed among the residents of sweltering and crowded cities, and among (as Dr. Shelton puts it) the drunkards and the ill-nourished.
A Hygienist writing in 1851 about cholera ( Dr. Shelton’s Hygienic Review , May 1976, page 196) says, “In New York as in the Old World, the chief victims of the cholera came from the same classes; the destitute poor, the badly fed, the insufficiently clothed, the crowded, the dirty and the intemperate.”
The better fed, better housed, clean, and temperate did not get cholera. The same is true today; the enervated and toxemic, the weak and dissipated are sick. Those who live according to the laws of nature are well.
Dr. Shelton says ( Dr. Shelton’s Hygienic Review , May 1976, page 197), “Before the Salk and Sabin v@xines there were great numbers of mild cases of polio and there were a few severe cases. This condition has not been changed, although many cases formerly diagnosed as polio are no longer so diagnosed. But I have yet to learn of a single child of Hygienic or vegetarian parents who has had polio. … A healthful regime will not cause polio nor cholera, smallpox, and diphtheria.”
Scarlet fever declined in incidence and virulence as rapidly as did diphtheria—without a v@xine. Cholera, bubonic plague, English sweat, and typhus fever declined and disappeared at the same time as smallpox—only smallpox had a v@xine! Some common factor must have been responsible for the total decline—not an “immunizing agent,” used for diphtheria and smallpox and not for the’ other diseases. Dr. Shelton asks, “Is v@xination merely a substitute for personal and community cleanliness?”
Van Hoffman: “Do We Really Need v@xination?”
Nicholas Von Hoffman, syndicated columnist, after reading L’Intoxication v@xinate , by Fernand Delarue, wrote and article, “Do we Really Need v@xinations?” ( St. Petersburg Independent , 9/18/78). He says that the French anti-v@xinationist has some compelling statistics supporting his position.
Von Hoffman continues:
“Swine flu experience or no, no practice of Western medicine is more globally accepted as safe and efficacious as inoculation. In a quiet way, some few doctors have grown so concerned about the known and unknown harmful effects of inoculation, they have wondered if the prevention of the disease may be more risky than going without protection. Prestigious medical figures have even gone so far as to venture that in recent years more polio may have been caused in the United States by the v@xine than by contracting the disease in the usual contagious manner.
“A long list of maladies ranging from blindness to convulsions to eczema to death has been imputed to v@xination, but for well over a hundred years informed opinion has held that the benefits of protection outweigh the risks. Now a small but growing number is wondering if inoculation does confer the protection claimed for it. We know, for instance, that some of the worst epidemics to ravage our kind were not suppressed by v@xination but by achieving a higher level of public cleanliness. Thus it was sanitation, not inoculation, which ended the Black Death. Something of the same thing may have occurred with smallpox.
“In the middle of the ’70s, the English launched a large public sanitation program and as it went forward the percentage of v@xinated people in the population and the incidence of smallpox both dropped. Moreover, medical records from the time indicate v@xinated people were more, not less, likely to get smallpox than the unv@xinated.
“Delarue centers his inquiries in France, where he says, for a long time there has been a number of practicing doctors as well as academicians who’ve had the gravest private doubts over inoculating people. They’ve not wanted to take the catcalls and the damage to their careers which speaking out would bring down on them.
“Somewhat the same situation probably obtains here. Yet old ideas have to be reexamined and retested from time to time. We have sunset laws for our public institutions so that every so often they must defend themselves and show that they are still necessary. The same should hold for old, long undiscussed scientific principles, especially when they concern the immediate health and well-being of millions.”
21.2 Dr. Mendelsohn: Now I Am Against All v@xines
Dr. Robert S. Mendelsohn’s book, Confessions of a Medical Heretic , contains three pages (pages 143-145) about the dangers of immunizations, and the fact that “immunized” people may not only be in greater danger of contracting the specific disease against which they were v@xinated (than if unv@xinated), but are also subject to neurological and sometimes fatal conditions caused by the v@xination.
Dr. Mendelsohn says, “The entire flu shot effort resembles some massive roulette game, since from one year to the next it’s anybody’s guess whether the strains immunized against will be the strains that are epidemic. We were all afforded a peek at the real dangers of flu v@xines when, in 1976, the great swine flu fiasco revealed, under close government and media surveillance, 565 cases of Guillain-Barre paralysis resulting from the v@xine, and thirty “unexplained” deaths of older people within hours after receiving the shot.”
Dr. Mendelsohn recently told American Natural Hygiene Society member Barry Mesh that “now he is against all v@xines.”
21.3 “Mistakes” and “Bad Batches” (Contaminated v@xine)
When an epidemic occurs on the heels of a mass immunization, the excuse is often given that “it was a bad batch.” Sometimes “mistakes” occur. A recent (fall 1982) report from Sarasota, Florida, is a case in point. “Health officials in Sarasota admitted Tuesday a miscalculation in determining the dosage of a v@xine resulted in 19 youngsters receiving 10 times the recommended amount of Rifampin, a v@xine for hemophilius meningitis. Dr. Robert Laurie, head of the Sarasota County Health Department, said the overdose administered over the weekend resulted in adverse reactions in the 19 children, but none of them had to be hospitalized. The v@xine was given to the parents of 19 children at Grace United Methodist Church Day Care Center at Venice after a three-year-old girl at the center was stricken with the disease.” (Craig Basse, Sunrise Digest, St. Petersburg Times .) Sometimes the “bad batches” or “mistakes” result in deaths.
In Barbara Ann Boruff’s article (referred to previously), she also says:
“In addition to the likelihood of disease, complications, or death, is the possibility of receiving contaminated v@xine. Since 1954, several such incidents have occurred. One is the well-known Cutter scandal, which became the impetus for the establishment of a federal agency to monitor the effectiveness and safety of inoculations for mass immunization. This organization is the Division of Biologies Standards (DBS).
“In the early seventies, the DBS came under severe criticism with regard to its practices. In 1961, several million people received polio and adenovirus v@xines that had been contaminated with a monkey virus known as SV40, known to cause cancer in hamsters. Its effect on humans is not yet known. Instead of taking the remaining v@xine off the market, the DBS continued to allow their usage ‘rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall.’ ( Science , March 17, 1972).”
21.4 Let’s Look At the Record
Excerpts from Don’t Get Stuck!
William Howard Hay, M.D., Pocono, Pennsylvania June 25, 1937, Address before The Medical Freedom Society (published in the Congressional Record) on the Lemcke Bill to Abolish Compulsory v@xination:
… “I know of one epidemic of smallpox comprising nine hundred and some cases, in which 95% of the infected had been v@xinated, and most of them recently …
“A number of years ago, Cook County, Illinois Hospital decided to immunize (against diphtheria) one-half of the nursing staff, and not the other half. Diphtheria broke out soon afterward among the immunized cases, not the others …
“Within six years of the U.S. takeover of the Phillipines and after 30,000,000 v@xinations, they suffered the worst onset of smallpox, the worst epidemic three times over, that had ever occurred … and it was almost three times as fatal. The death rate ran as high as 60% in certain areas, where formerly it had been 10% and 15%.”
Report of U.S. Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson, July 24, 1942:
“Recent army experience with yellow fever v@xine resulted in 28,505 cases of hepatitis, with 62 deaths, as of July 24, 1942.”
In 1957, nearly half the paralytic cases of polio in children between five and fourteen occurred in v@xinated children. It was admitted that the v@xine had been causing paralysis. There were more polio cases in 1958 than in 1957—6,029 cases, with 3,122 paralytic. In 1959 there were 8,577 cases of polio, with 5,694 paralytic. (The Salk v@xine had been introduced in 1955.) In 1959, the health director of the state of Idaho; Dr. Carl Eklund, one of America’s v@xination authorities; and Dr. Florio, the medical officer of Denver, all spoke out against the epidemic and crippling effects of the Salk v@xine.
1961 (Chicago Daily News, 9/16/61):
In 1959, the Sabin Live Virus v@xine for polio was introduced. “Eleven persons who received Sabin oral v@xine a mass immunizing program in the Syracuse, New York, area have developed paralytic polio, the U.S. Public Health Service reported yesterday.”
1964 (Awake Magazine, 11/22/64):
“The U.S. Public Health Service recommended that the Sabin oral v@xine for polio be discontinued to adults … A seventeen-man committee found that 57 cases of paralytic polio have been found that were compatible with the possibility of having been induced by the v@xine. The vast majority … involved adults.”
Read Don’t Get Stuck or The Poisoned Needle for details about the trail of crippling and death left by v@xination. A large volume could be filled with the recorded cases.
21.5 The Swine Flu Hoax
Dr. Shelton said in 1976, “The pain proposed by the president” (Ford) “involves the absurdity of introducing the supposed cause of influenza into the bodies of the people to produce in them mild cases of influenza in the hope that this will cause them to produce protective antibodies and thus enable them to escape more serious disease by the accidental invasion of their bodies by the same supposed causes. Viruses are very accommodating little critters. They introduce mild disease when introduced into the body by physicians and serious disease when introduced accidentally. What an enormous debt the medical profession owes to viruses!”
A student of mine (in 1976) reported to me that her father had been caught up in the swine flu immunizing frenzy, and had died the day after receiving the v@xination.
It may seem incredible that the 1976 Swine Flu Epidemic hoax, with its terrible consequences, has not aroused the public to reject all so-called immunizations. But the government and the medical profession have glib and plausible explanations and continue to sell the idea that the risks involved in “immunization” are small, compared to the potential benefit. And the public still accepts the idea of “contagion” being the cause of “epidemics”, and allow their children to stand in the “immunizing” lines.
21.6 Compulsory v@xinations and Exemptions
Those who doubt the necessity or advisability of v@xination are browbeaten into submission by the “authorities” who insist “it is the law.” Actually, the laws vary from state to state.